Autonomous Driving Analysis, sumarry And Conclusion: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
== Autonomous Neural Network Training == | == Autonomous Driving Neural Network Training == | ||
== Experiment Analysis == | == Experiment Analysis == | ||
* Models trained on discrete steering values showed significantly better results than regression-based approaches. | * Models trained on discrete steering values showed significantly better results than regression-based approaches. | ||
Version vom 12. Juni 2025, 19:10 Uhr
Autonomous Driving Neural Network Training
Experiment Analysis
- Models trained on discrete steering values showed significantly better results than regression-based approaches.
- Grayscale recordings increased model stability.
- Calibrated images helped reduce the steering error caused by lens distortion.
Limitations
- Hardware constraints limited the maximum processing speed.
- Initial data quality was poor due to randomized manual steering input.
- Better results were obtained after switching to discrete, consistent control signals.
- However, simultaneous recording, steering, and saving caused performance bottlenecks due to the Jetson Nano’s limited resources.
Summary and Outlook
This project demonstrated that it is possible to optimize autonomous navigation on the JetRacer using a combination of classical control algorithms and neural networks. Despite hardware limitations, stable autonomous driving behavior was achieved.
Future improvements could include:
- Expanding the dataset with more diverse environmental conditions.
- Flash working Model directly on jetson nano using gpu coder
- Use accurate gamepad and use more complex training method.
- Improving automated labeling and refining the PD controller parameters for faster driving without loss of robustness.